The Moral Compass would appear to give infinite options for a person to develop thier morality but this is not the same as there being an option on what morality is or how it is defined. Sure there are options on every thing and nothing but the opinions do not change what is or what is not.

A notion that the population could be controlled to limit consumtion, rather than just address the consumption is an anti-procreation idea will not go down well with many people.

The desir to limit consumption on anything other than a personal level is not a moral direction but an ethical one. If we as animals wnat tp consume then we must be aware of the limitations.

It is not that the Earth cannot support this indulgent consumption that homosapeiens seem hell bent on as it is not the job of the planet to support people but rather an indivdual or group cannot sustain themselves indefinetly without consuming.

This is where the option to have a moral direction provides for a sustainable option. It is hard to maintain a morla direction but once it has been found it does not fade away, unlike ethics which are more like leaves blown from the autumn trees, pretty but temporal.

Morality is not a polarised issue, amorlaity and immorality are just forms of ethics.