The Language of Consumption in the terms of DNA Whereas the English language has 26 letters to build words, DNA has four characters with which to build genes.

DNA is a sequence of 'characters' that form chromosomes 'code' that is translated to form amino acids and complex proteins. How this translation happens is another matter! A full DNA code is displayed in a complete set of chromosomes, though different in each individual plant or animal. There can be duplication or cloning and identical twins are developed from a single DNA at first cell division. Cloning can happen at initial conception of the root cell or at any point when a child cell is prompted to replicate. It is worth noting that although there is a theoretical duplication in the two strands of DNA that form a chromosome they can be different as 'random' mutations occur due to changes in the energy level of quantum particles that make up the atoms. The DNA code is laid down in a series pairs of nucleic acids (Adenine and Thymine) and (Cytosine and Guanine).

Genes are a little more instructive than words. Words in themselves are a pure indicator of properties whereas a gene is an instruction set, that in a particular setting has a method which given it's setting will provoke an event upon external interaction. Some external input is beyond the method, a) micro input such as radiation may alter the gene to be ineffective or improper, b) non-aligned input may be ignored and c) a range of chemical and physical environments may cause absolute destruction. Events are responses of the methods to external stimuli and result in a learned structure of ethics. I say ethics as the set or rules that are drawn upon to establish continuity of existence of one of more methods. The homo-sapien intellect is one such collection of methods, and as such a person is a collection of ethical decisions as to whether one course of action is likely to be more sustainable than another. There is no moral aspect to ethics although ethics through morality in terms of absolute right can be implied by immortality. Here I'm querying the language basics or a basic language, via ethical models, to see how close a consciousness can get to separating an ethical understanding from a moral one. There are only four characters to build DNA and that DNA is chromosomes made of DNA account for all biologically progenitor and degenerate experiences that are commonly assessed as awareness. Unlike the verbal wranglings of creatures, the language built on DNA's four characters are, for want of further information, the single base of plant and animal being. Yet like other languages, words have not only to be strung together for power but an agreement has to be made to define and use the words in a specific way. Words, although common and exact amongst different settings, have different responses. Some word or gene in an uncommon position can drastocally change the meaning and outcome of the sentence (method) How can the basic characters have gathered to form genes and chromosomes that has such variable and wide ranging effects. Can consciousness exist at such levels? Is consciousness really only self awareness that grows as a person recognizes their dependence and interdependence or can the concept or morality exist beyond the ethical structures for survival. My assertion is that moral consciousness, does exist beyond any structure born of parts and hence must be beyond the effects of words and intellect, has no method for the purposes of creation, which would require characters to build from. It would seem their are many examples or hierarchical intelligences, spirits, gods and angels that are created from one set of characters to develop a newer and updated quasi-moral - overriding - impersonal rules to guide those that are indebted to society and ancestry. Clearly these are powerful ethical structures but cannot be moral. Fights between individuals, tribes and religions only express the fear of pain and dying yet the actors seem only concerned with their degree of pain for that is the limit of their awareness. The game of ethics that forms around human suffering or planetary ecology is just that, a self aggrandized set of actions to improve our worth that we may continue this degrading method of consumption and propagation dependent upon degradation??? We may call it life but it is nothing of the sort if you have any moral value. Given a) each cell,optimally, has two 'tumor suppressant' genes b) both could be destroyed in any or multiple cells If cells produce unfettered replicas what options are there to catch and destroy the clones before they become pathologically malignant?