Intellect like the stomach needs food and can be starved or poisoned. Some unusual foods can pass through the stomach or mind and leave little trace even though indigestible and incomprehensible. Little trace but these things can be start of a new equally unusual path.

Some times there is an attempt to digest or understand that takes so much energy, is so difficult: the body becomes sick and confused; rarely one or the other. Sometimes depression, madness and death set in.

But what dies? It is not the stomach or intellect is it?

Where's the soul that decides to eat or try new experiences, knowing the dangers, but dangers to what? Why take the risk? Are eating and thinking essential activities? Eating is definitely destructive so there can be no ultimate health from doing so. And thinking about food isn't really a part of the intellect, though fasting could be.

I can recognised a body or a being that contains a stomach to digest solids and a brain to digest experiences,but to what end: death?

And what of not death and not of the killing spree of consumption. Can the intellect be non consuming? Conciousness appears without need or direction, hence no consumption. Not being based on killing it cannot die, and as it cannot be created from something, it was not created so must simply exist.

The soul is aware of this being without boundaries and knows it cannot relate to it directly or indirectly,but what the soul may do is ease the desire for killing and free the body from the sickness of digestion.

The soul can only be happy in such a place else it cannot be a soul, for the soul is only the part that is aware of immortality and bliss. So