Specsavers: Dumbos and deceitful
Vision Express: Clever, understanding and polite. Given the problem I have, mentioned below about the bridge measurement and subsequent weight, the manager also acknowledge that the lens could have been thinner and has offered me a new pair free.
The Old Glasses Shop : 01434 221122 : Round glasses by Renaissance
Bought four of these only to find the bridge measurement is out of sync with common UK standards, which is the minimum width between the lenses. This measurement goes from half the width of the rims that holds each lens. This model, although sold as 19mm works out at 23mm. This extra width means the optical centres are off by 4mm resulting in extra thickening of the lens to accommodate the fitting.
Show images here ....
This only became apparent when I had the prescriptions fitted and became a big problem with the higher optics, resulting in spectacles that weighed 65g. As I had three pairs made up, at a cost of £600, the suppliers have credited me two pairs and I returned the unused one.
This credit of approx £240 will cover a new Saville row frame. Details to follow.
Saville Row: 18k Shiny Rolled Gold 22/40
Saville Row 0208 985 5466 (9am to 4pm)
How I got to buy this model
A bit of a mystery as! it would seem, the twelth fret should be halfway along the string to provide forman octave higher.
The theory is that a shorter string i.e. half the length would vibrate higher than an octave as under the same tension it would be stiffer. This applies moreso to thicker strings. So the saddle is moved a bit further frm the 12th to compensate. Ideally each string would have it's own adjustable saddle, which is the case on many electric guitars; on acoustic's this isn't employed, which is regretable and questionable.
On the Taylor C356CE the 'tusk' saddle is elaborately moulded for each string
The 12th fret is 12.75" (12&24/32nds) from the nut, the distances from the 12th fret to the saddle are:
E (1&2) are exactly 12.75"
G (5) is 1/32nd longer
E (11) is 2/32nds longer
Still the guitar cannot be tuned very well, the compensation does not give an octave at 12th fret. There is a question as to the age of the strings and if they have stretched un-uniformly.
The other is inherent in the nut also has a similar effect and stiffens the end of the string when played open, apparently the nut is often set back an extra mil to compensate but not variable as in the saddle ????
Guitar: Taylor 356CE Second hand from Mansons ExeterClick Mini: Toshiba 8.9" Tablet with Keyboard.
5th April 2016 Noticed a chip in the top right corner of the screen. Haven't a clue as to when and how it occured. here are some images.
Where duality is a non-conflicting situation, the decison whether to accept or reject no longer exists.
The circle is a representation of the concept that each of us is totally dependent upon the all as the all is on each of us, despite that all will continue at the demise of any person.
The defintiion of a circle is an infinite set of points, a line, where each is equally distant from a common point. In the circle that common point is the centre.
Yet somehow if all poiunts are equal then the centre is one of the points in the circumference and each point in the circumference is also the centre. This concept cannot be shown in 2 dimensional graphics and yet it is this 2 dimensional form that largely governs the way me communicate, i.e. perverse linearity.
To say that we have spacial awareness may be true but it is not used as the primary form of communication unless the 2 dimensional language isn't sufficient and the force of contraint is deemed appropriate.
By now the concept of language has already corupted the original concept as all is one and one is all then there need be no communication.
So where do we go from here, 'chaos or community' ?
Linear logic is binary in that there are only two ways to go, forward or backward, yet each is defined as positive in that change occures, whereas not change is represented by zero, which is the circle. Change, a defined line, is but part of the circle, yet all too often is seen as a separate entity.
And so we talk in dualistic terms, which very ofetn are inappropriately termned as opposites when if act they are compliments, in that the pair go to for the whole.