avoid

I note differing arguments that can be heated due due interpretation and whereas I make the following assertions they are only to assert my use of the English language to communicate logic and feelings.

I will forego pre-birth except to say that at birth warmth is the most essential item and awareness of this new environment. After warmth, fluid is the next sensual awareness and in most animals that may come from the previous hosts and in mammals the mammary glands.
The awareness of smell although present at birth is soon to be associated with warmth and fluid, sweet at that and so to taste.

These early awarenesses are not a temporary issue, with the associated sound there follows a focus of sight. And so we have the evolvement of awareness via the senses.

It take some time to aggregate sensory awareness to enable the acquisition of those fundamentals of warmth and fluid.

Logic now plays it's part and is used with the other four senses mentioned to sustain the warmth a and fluid, touch is the an intermediary as it senses the essentials directly without logic having to assess the value of the object now experienced.

Later along the road of consumerism there is a realisation that resources are not just limited by their existence but on increasing effort as competition increases and personal intellectual and physical diminish. Along this road of realisation there is a profound acknowledgment of logic and a persons ability to use it, invariably to acquire a stable store of the essentials. However it cannot go unnoticed that logic itself is not a consumer, 2 plus 2 may be counted as four but the 2 and 2 still exist.

Counting is logic applied to the future, a frail resource, the future. Most futures imagined are just replicas of past desires, not really anything new. The addiction of using the mind to ensure future comforts degrades the minds ability to be used for consciousness.

The initial intellectual awareness has now created a prison of expectations and woe betide any person or animal that doesn't conform, or plant that is not useful to ensuring warmth and fluidity.

Sustainability of planetary resources, sun, warmth, water, and values such as freedom of movement become an ever increasing demand on the mind whilst the mind is hell bent on supplying the body with the essentials first noted.

But that desire will pass, slowly or in the blink of an eye, so consciousness is an option for those fed up with awareness.

I quote "radiance, transparency, absence" It may be attractive to be radiant and promise the future, or better to be transparent and alow other to devise thier own future, but what would it be like to give up all power and be absent.

Consider a resource such as an apple tree, ok not very warm but not ice and sweet and juicy, who would take of the fruit of the tree. But do you radiate the fruit? Do you pick more than you can eat and give the excess to others, and shine, or do you take only want you want to eat and leave others to make their own selection of delights. But if it's to be sustainable then take nothing, be absent from the pickings.

From the sun to the invisible space and consciousness. As logic infers, what is cannot not be. Immortality is a property of consciousness and devoid of matter and energy. Matter and energy are the foci of awareness.

I may feel the pain of others as I can empathise through logic, but logic tells me also that there is no sustainable way of relieving pain. Being aware of suffering there is a temptation to use it to enhance the future by trying to limit the cause, as if there would be no offset somewhere else. How many rabbits have to die to keep one cat alive. Matter or energy it's all the same, the sun is not the saviour more the devil in disguise ~ a really big rabbit to feed billions of cats for billions of years until the big rabbit in the sky dies.

If there is a value indicated by logic, the message, is the mind has to transfer focus away from unsustainable resources no matter how warm and loving it feels and go beyond the future to the present.

So it it were a tree as so many philosophies portray let's have a look.

The root of awareness is shocked at birth as the mind turns to Warmth, Fluid, Smell, Taste, Sound, Light. Only the first two Warmth and Fluidity are deemed essential the others are tools for the awareness.

The mind has automatic options in terms of heat, the most important 'essential' radiation or close contact with an energetic body. The body reacts quickly to overheating by moving away if possible.

When the essential are acquired the mind can drift away from awareness and look at itself, what it does and how it does it and why, yet never is there a permanent answer. There can be no beginning to immortal consciousness, no objects to be aware of, no time to interrupt the feeling of being,

If the mind is a tree rooted in awareness then consumption is the only future, however if the mind uses logic, a sustainable resource all is not possible as in the future will tell but the all is and the mind will open to the the eternal.

As this opening is a path it can allegorised as the branches of a tree wherein that the focus is not to feed the tree but to free the roots from the binding of the future.

To find the qualities of consciousness, such as immortality, needs be to leave this earth either \slowly or in the blink of an eye. What will be found exists here and now, just look at yourself your spirit cannot die if your soul acquires immortality.

Not all is clear or visible or rather to the human eyes and mind most is hidden and that is not just the way we have developed by external environment but consciousness hasn't that ability for spatial separation.

What is hidden in me I can see as aggression. This expansive, destructive and consuming energy is partially held in check by fluidity but there is only so much weight that this bond can hold. In society no matter how tolerant a person is to aggression there is only so much pressure a bond can withstand.

It is a foresight to see how the bound energy is released and will will decide where that is to be. The place can be external by degree, Mohammed, Krishna, Buddha, Christ > In order of explosion to implosion. Other cultural example are available but when the pressure is on space is the place.

The real danger is movement especially asking for company.

Slowly the toxic parts can counter each other and free the intelligence from holding to this material realm but it cannot be pushed or pulled apart. No effort is required to dissipate.

My friend Gavin has just noted that although he was not looking forward to a visit from Steve as it was raining and consequently inconvenient, not having exotic or even reasonable shelter, when Steve and Mike left Gavin was a but disappointed. So not wanting the visitors then became not wanting them to leave. I pointed out that it is often the case that when someone gets what they want they often realise they don't really want it.

The point I am about to make is that it is not a pair of opposites, it's not a change of mind, though from social intimacy view it exactly a change of mind.

The issue here is that if the material object of desire or lack of is not the issue in min d then the mind has not changed, just the appearance has. To put it more clearly, maybe, the desire of wanting or not wanting is the same in both instances.

My use is that I have a friend who wants to move away from this area. I like them enough not to want them to leave but love them enough to want them to go where they please. So I will neither encourage them to stay or help them decide upon the move. If I find myself doing either I will change the words to avoid action in any direction.

For I ma happy not to want someone to visit and happy that I don't want them to leave. It is that I don't want is the key. Want I don't want is to want. =Equivalently if I want company there will be a place where I want the company to go.

If I bring it, then I dispose of it. If it comes of it's own volition then its own volition will direct it.

Y Perpetuate

Procreation I find a disturbing word, ill defined and ill used. Sure it implies some form of creation, but the Pro bit? Every species has a design to perpetuate it's genetic plan via some sort of activity. Humans, in English at least, may call this socially ~ (Making Love) or more funnily (Rocking and Rolling) Other less agreeable words are fucking, knocking, banging, screwing and more obnoxious is the idea of rape. 'Having sex' is a simple term for any of the above but the motivation is seemingly unclear.

In the terms of rape the motivation seems to be power used in an abusive way at least to one of the bodies. Yet if procreation is a genetic and generic plan then it overrides all other concerns. The survival of the fittest becomes not just the norm but the only way to go.

True, especially in humans whose offspring require tending for a few years, the nurturing takes a high toll on a persons activity and can be seen as supporting the procreation by ensuring another generation can continue the sexual activity. Nurturing is so demanding in it's consumption of resources that not only does competition increase with population but with the fact that ever increasingly frail people are supported requiring yet another exponential level of consumption.

In all the wars that have past are being fought and are yet to come, many of the weak perish. Whether by design or by disease people die and other, weaker, creatures and plants will suffer a more rapid demise, with some genetic plans being removed from any future environment.

So why? I mean why do we bother to keep this plan 'alive' if all it means is that we have to kill? Clearly this killing and consumption is not infinitely sustainable even for one person let alone a whole species. So there is no moral issue about who or what is consumed just one on my we have sex.

If it isn't for power, then is it to temporarily hide fear? Yet clearly upon awakening, increasingly fear has the upper hand in that we consume more out of fear of loosing some value. That value may be invested in another as in the one with whom you make love, or the offspring of such a love. Other investments are available.

If an individual can understand only half it's genetic plan can be transferred in the traditional way to an offspring there would be no such thing as sexism. If that individual can also see that matter how many children they have they are always going to fall short of perpetuity.

If reproduction can be taken on smaller scales then race and species would not be competing for resources. There would be no Aryan, Jewish, Muslim, Human genetic plan to perpetuate but an acknowledgement that sex is a part time job doomed to failure and it is the minds inability to shake off fear that encourages nepotism.

Quantum conciousness does not require reproduction but it grows as one organism. So if the mind can slowly be turned and tuned to immortality through whatever means then a family of spirited people will have the same goal, to love as one.

For the individual it is qualitative conciousness that directs the mind and the multiple sense of there being more than one quantum spins the mind in ever decreasing space, until with a final fearless gasp the even the air is free from human grasp.

Immunisation

Clear the mind ~ Counter the weight with whatever makes you lighter.

I have little desire to discus any of the conspiracy theories. Shapes and designs are mathematical models to achieve specific outcomes, which are just aspects of homo sapiens use of logic. It matters not what shape the earth is or what laws govern the movement of planets or quantum particles, nor what laws govern mankind, if they work they will be used like a spade and a fork.

A long long time ago, in my relative youth, I became aware of the option to turn my mind on with a little help from my friends. I could tune in to whatever I wished, planets, stars, gods ~ then to drop the lot and get to the land to set my soul free. After decades of trying to do this as a community I am clearly dropping out alone through a spacial portal under the guise of time.

The soul unlike the lotus does not grow, but like anything that I want cultivation is a method to weed out that which I no longer want. The weeds of the mind that have so long looked like food to keep me alive, when in fact they are keeping me in the killing fields. I am clearing the fields of desire to better view the soul. As the soul is not in outer-space all I have to do is to clear a path through my mind to see it and be at peace with it.

Oh! The weeds, I let them grow so freely as it appears they want to be. A path through the weeds is all I need.