Of course any interpretation of the Immortal law is a temporal one but that it can be interpreted, so badly, as to be a misunderstanding does not deny that each exists.

Here's a quote I took from Aljazera today 24th August 2021

Within Fiqh discourse, every possible human action can be the object of certain moral demands falling on the spectrum of prohibited, reprehensible, permissible, commendable, and mandatory. A wide range of issues – from how Muslims should drink water to how Muslims should wage wars – is subject of Fiqh discourse.

Law, on the other hand, is state command backed by the state monopoly of violence. At the core of the law is coercion. If one equates Fiqh with state law, then it would mean that the state coercive apparatus can be used to shape every aspect of human life, which basically constitutes totalitarianism. Most areas of human life should always remain outside the scope of state power. State law and Fiqh should remain apart.
Haroun Rahimi

Assistant Professor of Law at the American University of Afghanistan 24 Aug 2021