A person wants comfort and being a weak individual, from birth, argues and works to find otheres to exploit or co-operate with to acheive satisfaction.

The arguments therefore have to be those that others find they benefit from, hence the National Good or God.

There is no need to believe in either, though many claim to. It is enough that the concept exists, like that of a straight line or a circle.

It is the language that is the issue, whether for the acheivement of a nationally agreed goal, that is a democratically goal, lol, or a moral goal akin to that of God.

However the failings occur not just in understanding and action as the language itself is not only poorly used but more often than not decipetfully used. It is inherent in the use of anything to persuade anothet to join forces.

For a language to work it has to be perfect and that can only be achieved by God, not the Nation.

The issue can be brought more to Earth by noting that the language of mankind is ude to refer to something external that when used as intended has a personal benefit, though others may suffer.

The language of God however does not have this dualism. The language of God and the message are the same, there is no intent and no outcome. To know the language of God is to be a part of the message, knowing the language is knowing God. The language of God cannot be translated to mankind for benefit, it can only be received, not used.

So we have a quandary, a person has an idea that they want to communicate but the language they use will no doubt be the language of mankind and the audience with be likewise mankind. The colouring of ideas to imply morals and benefit, it's what, politicians, teachers, parents, friends and enemies rely on to get co-operation, but only to co-operate in continuing consumption the only game in town. Sad is the mind that does not also have the language of God to dwell within.