avoid

ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder)

As the H word implies it is noted by Hyperactivity, if that can be defined.

But the notion of any attention deficit would seem to play on the notion that a certain amount of attention is either a necessity for expected function or a subsequent change in expected function following and therefore associated with a drop in attention. How a person deals with that is where the notion that the subsequent actions of the person is deemed hyperactive and a disorder to the environment the activity occurs in

Defining words. The soul seems to refer to a simple form of identity, not so the persona. Between the two is the mind and brain.

These are 1. The Truth 2. The Straight 3. The Curve 4. The Crooked

The Truth as being the only truth, a moral and spiritual truth. But if the Truth be told then it be not the Truth for something so great cannot be uttered, sang, written, drawn or crafted by a consuming animal no matter how sapient they be.

The Straight has the advantage of direction which plants understand as they reach up for light and down for water, but homo sapiens see other directions akin to the flat earth antagonist. The direction of animals is for shelter and food and the animal is blindingly oblivious when in such a search mode to that which is deemed straight and straight forward is anything other than straight' but it is toward. It is this sense of direction that is bound and tied to satisfying fulfilment. Animals may have little else to fill than their stomachs whilst mankind is haunted by The Truth.

The Curve is but all any animal can managed in their hungry pursuit for if the prey deviates from a predictable path then the pursuers deviation from the fore-made plan is inevitable. Even plants will curve towards the sun and send out side roots in search of water, so what then can animals achieve. Taking the lot of other animals and plants there is little use in being straight let alone considering the truth or merits of the action when change is the only constant for an insatiable consumer.

The Crooked is a purely Homo Sapiens adventure. To actively deceive another thinking creature, not something other animals do to any notable degree and plants seem not to . To bend another person to the will of the crook, to steal when trust has been established or to break the bonds of the all so carefully crafted laws that bind humans in their pathetic adherence to a path that offers salvation from the storms of Earth. These are the peak survivors that by not holding to any earthly laws other than survival are closer to the real animals than homo sapiens really think they are. It is not the encompassing or denial of brutality than provides host to the mind games but that neither are a direction yet helps to keep the Truth out of reach.

People, and for that matter other animals, consume specific biological compounds, plants consume minerals, water and sunlight and the sun and other heavenly bodies consume indiscriminate mass.

Consumption, from my human perspective with that intellect born of homo sapiens is clearly an unpleasant aspect. This does not mean there is no joy in the taste of food the company of people, shelter from the weather but in the need to consume other matter, intellectual, emotional, biological, and mineral is demeaning.

It matters for two reasons, first that it means I am dependent upon a finite resource, so no immortality there and secondly if I were to adhere to an ethical style and that ethics included all others then I can not be happy knowing my consumption not only puts me in direct competition with other but that they are my potential food.

To counter this inhumane activity and bring focus to that which is immortal I have to reduce my consumption before death removes the option.

The ELF trust was created, well as I thought, by and for people who wanted to be responsible for a fair share of land wherefrom and whereon they would establish methods to reduce their consumption. The problem being I am the only survivor, with the disturbing notion that my aggressive, uncompromising stance alienates all others, apart from non-human animals.

I have no problem with a person who consumes as long as they do not campaign that others should reduce theirs or share their loot. People are basically animals that consume and is it up to the individual to assess how to satisfy their desires.

I do have a problem, however when confronted by the so called eco-freaks, the planet savers, the half-hearted vegetarians, the vegans who claim to care about all animal suffering, the tree-huggers and fair trade lobby. The clue is in the plural. People often achieve greater efficiency in consuming when working together, despite the fact that it is short sighted and only serves their ethical group of choice and thereby uses the resources even quicker - so no hope that any of them will tune into an everlasting consciousness. My problem lies in being caught or addicted to the relationships I have with these individuals, it's easy to keep away from the do-gooder groups. But when the individuals are family or long term friends it is difficult to deny them.

To labour the point. If ethics has any universal credit then it must apply to all. Treating your children equally is a simple objective but not really possible to achieve. Treating all the family, all religion, all the nation, all the people, all the animals, all the biological kingdom whist we consume each other is clearly a cruel deceptive aspiration applied to children so they are less demanding and work for the good of all or better say wants of those they deem a requirement for their survival, comfort, lust and debauchery.

The best is to reduce consumption and allow others the freedom to grow. There is no point in consuming more, as charities do in supporting the homeless and hungry with shelter and food so that they can consume for longer, consume more and procreate other creatures of the same habit. The result is that people will have to exploit more resources for the ever growing population or more specifically to feed the desires of any ever increasing hopelessness of fulfilment.

Although some religions, without a complete lack of logic, claim that all will be sorted for the good at death, whilst the others will be born again into an increasingly deprived word; that does not equate to the same notion as reducing consumption. These religious people often use Jesus or Mohamed as guides to their resurrection,, or lack of whilst upping the inhumane and inhuman consumption they so vehemently lobby again - now we have a proliferation of charity workers and eco-freaks.

The religious use past guides to excuse them of earthly matters and wage war on anyone and anything that isn't of their ethics, whilst the charity and eco freaks try to save groups of people and the environment they are so dependent upon. Justifying their own lack of commitment of reduce they rest in the glory of the attention they receive from the forlorn consumers who's ability to fuck the planet quicker is in the charities workers hands and hearts. Weak hearts and hands that cannot look after themselves and increasingly depend upon the new order of so called humans to gather resources and share them out to the administrators design. Administrators Ach!

With the religious group I feel there is an ability to see beyond the earth for fulfilment, though I challenge any of their commitment, whereas for the humanists I see only their dependence upon each other as the primary goal, another sure way to screw the bio-sphere and any other resource that comes into orbit.

The few die hard religious freaks will, as they always must, perish and die in the flames and mayhem created by the blast of the thinking people when they leave Earth, aware that there's little more to take.

The term 'hard work' is touted as relating to some value other than, what?, soft work or laziness?

The issue that comes to mind is stress. Without stress it's hard to imagine the building of muscles, intellect, emotion and stamina.

Some bodies may be better adapted at physical exertion, and other may then have to exploit their intellect to make up for a lack of physical ability. But lets not make any bones about it, to be a consumer means developing stamina.

A person, with or without ample bodily abilities will have good stamina if they can spread the stress of acquisition for their consumptive desire over the range of abilities, physical, intellectual and emotional.

So the not so obscure secret for an average able body is to ensure their lifestyle is equally demanding in all three spheres. Someone who is ill prepared to do this may well whinge that life is hard, life is a bore and that they work too hard. What they mean is that they think they should acquire more for less work.

It's all relative to consumption, the more you want the more you work, and if you take care to work on the body, intellect and emotions in healthy proportions work is never hard, but just enjoyable enough to do as little as possible to satiate your desires.

Consumerism is an animal, nay material characteristic, it not human. As a great ape, or one of the homo sapiens, each strives to consume to remove the fear of emptiness. The soul cannot be empty or filled. So whilst the intellect has the ability to identify with the soul, let the human be free to wander the cosmos whilst the ape learns to cease the emotional and physical struggle to continue consuming.

Age is not the issue but intellect is. Those homo sapiens that tout or use the words 'hard work' have a degree of intellect that is not guided by cognitive intelligence, but more by memory. Politicians must rely on votes so memory is their undoing, yet they must obey the rules.

I once heard or read a story that I will place in the first person and reiterate, expand, update, embellish and adapt it with my more recent thoughts and relevance.

I once came across someone, who's dark cloak cast an unusually large shadow. carrying a lamp. They seemed to be searching for something. Given my desire to emotionally engage I offered assistance and asked if they had lost something. Given a positive answer I then asked what it was that was lost, to be told it was a key. On a role of vulture like scavenging the situation I asked if it was important, a dumb question really as why else would the search be in dark, and the searcher carrying a lamp in an out of the way forgotten place. The place being so forgettable I cannot remember, to this day, where I met the searcher.

Undisturbed by my interference and dumb question I was assured it was very important to find the key, whereupon I offered to help. The offer accepted I asked if there was any memory of when the key was last used and where it could be. The answer was rather disappointing as the searcher, who by name known now as Hermit, said memory was of little use and most of it was discarded on the way.

A little frustrated I promptly retorted, "what makes you think it may find it here" which seems rather philosophical rather that helpful. Hermit replied that he had no idea where it could be, but this is the only place there is light.

My recent thoughts are commented, but you will have to be a member of this blog to read it, else contact me to discuss