It's not all navy even though five years of my late teens were coloured that way. Morso red was the colour of the day, every day; controlled (mostly) aggression.

So the reds were not the real enemy, nor the yellows.

The underlying feeling is one of control, so when I saw the green in her full majesty, whilst up the mountains on acid and in the fields again on acid, I saw and heard clearly that the enemy is not other people but my own indulgences, gullibility and loneliness. Being part of a loving community, still seems sensible.

The two vagaries are the enemy and the community, The one thing that is clear is commitment.

But commitment to forming a community is based on removing evil and defining evil is the focus of commitment. Yet fear is a notion of lack of support in the community, as individually we are too week to survive.

So what support to we need. Bodily: warmth(shelter), water and food. However the acquisition of these forms put us at odds with other, hence the community military.

The removal of the evil from ones own life therefore equates to the removal of the need fro support from the community.

The greens and other religions exploit this to form their communities, yet it only personal ability that can reduce the fear. There's no intent to reuse it or recycle it, nor any promise of future release from the animal bondage.

So if you are committed to fighting the evil, listen to yourself when you are quiet and see at yourself with eyes shut, feel yourself at rest, taste the sweet rot that is an animal and focus on asking, demanding and taking less from those inhabitants of this planet that are clearly less intelligent and able.

More green will turn the rich mix of nay and red that is purple a shallower shade of grey, but white is not a virtue just a community will a common background view through eyes that are still open in the the vulgar consumer.

Here is within direction and direction is within,

Without is the notion that here is a limited space. Yet here is not limited without nor within direction.

Direction leads to notions of here and without, even without direction. However leading nowhere is not without but within.

With and here are two entities that fulfil the being of conciousness. Whereas direction may have it's source, without it is devoid of conciousness but has being.

Being, here with, is the form that defines to without. Without (not with) though in being has vision and sees that although not all of one is therefore not the only one.

Direction is infinite in choice of direction yet limited by the choice. Infinite is all, but nothing and ever so small.

Space has room for all direction whist direction has room only for itself.Eeach direction although logically aware of that other directions exist is not directly connected, for in loosing conciousness direction only has self being.

The progress of direction comes to conflict, Although in space there is room for every direction, knowledge of others impact upon each and so direction finds friction which is the basis of conflict.

Friction leads to heat, the development light and ultimately matter

And so my relief from conflict is the unravelling of logic that I may see that there is but one direction and that I am bound it as it is bound to me. Woe if that the search leads to friction.

Direction has its anchor here yet yearns not to be free but to be more. To be more than all I am yea even more than I will.

Will is not all but the power of direction. Will without direction is will within.

One thing the Green Party is clear on is that climate rules.

Science, no doubt, can show how we and other animals, (why we should need them?) can live on a tree and plant free environment, but that isn't the goal of most poeple. I would like to continue to dwell in as biologically diverse environment as possible. To that end I try to curtail my killing spree to give other forms the best opportunity to mutate and breed.

However the increasing human population could soon strip this planet bare.

So we have some future scenarios, short and long term sustainable options maybe.

By short term I mean processes that we can see will fail at some future event, but appear to prolong the exploitation through at least a few succeeding generations.

Long term solutions are the illusions we allow ourselves to justify the short term options.

Most 'green' changes to consumerism that are touted are purely alternative uses of a finite resource. and unless we consume an ever decreasing amount, such use cannot be sustainable.

Now before I go on to trash the 'sustainability' army I support those people who want to experience a change to a sustainable lifestyle and through changing their own consumerism aim in that direction. I do not support the gangs that try and persuade others to make changes.

So what power do we have to make changes?

The power is that of freedom from fear and dependency, not the power to manipulate, change or maintain the environment so that we can continue to benefit from it.

The sustainable approach is that the environment should benefit from each of us as individuals solely from our power of freedom, not from nuclear, quantum or solar power.

So here we have the root of the argument, that there is a potential energy below the material levels, chemical, atomic, and quanum etc. That we have reached the term quantum, which really means 'packet of energy' shows we haven't really advanced from 'a bag of coal': we still see energy as being wrapped in convenient forms for our exploitation.

Such dependence on destruction of form only perpetuates the consumer not the consumed.

Sadly only the religious freaks have kept alive the idea of an alternative, but that has always been used as the basis of authourity rather than freedom.

Still using the notions gleaned from religions and personal 'spiritual or cosmic' experiences I can focus and meditate on my unsustainable consumerism with a new lust for freedom from my killing spree.

So what about the global warming and climate change? Clearly our joint failure to be concerned about increasing consumption has create a sustainable destruction largely visited upon the lesser consumers by those of us predominate ones.

What we don't need God and the Queen to tell us is:
We what nore power
We want more money, as spears and guns don't do it for us.
More money means more consumerism and the way to get people to do those things we can not or will not do for ourselves.
Money sustains the elite that create the laws of business and decides who shall profit at another's expense :- animal having no money have few privileges.
Money is the new God
If everyone has more money everyone will be rich and all will be fine.
As if

We are approaching a place where everyone wants more, want to be rich, wants war.

We are afraid of our own indulgences, can't challenge them and to frail to live alone or in small family groups.

We continue to use use religion and politics to cajole and bully people into supporting the scam of sustainable development.

You really don't have to read this crap, but clearly I feel the need to write it so here goes:

Vote for nothing less, and ask for nothing more than a party that promotes fair and proportional representation of the people.

Everyone and all parties want better health, education, employmeny and security, but no party has access to the financial markets. The investors will always bank(vote) with whoever seems to be the prospective winner.

The competitive nature is fine for adolescents and kids at war but it is not the basis of a security for 7 billion people.

We need a government that the international community wants to work with not compete with.

We need people who will stand and say to the rich and idle to stop shouting the odds and words of mass deception.

Open and fair representation of the people is the backbone of sustainable government.

Infinity was my goal, Unbounded is the way and Unlimited is this place.
Danger is not so much all around me but all there is. Danger of becoming aware of the infinitely stupid habits that hook me to the killing game.

Please don't think of this as life. Existence yes, but what a degrading one.

Death is not to be courted, although it seems inevitable. It is anything but, it is a trough of illusion. It may be a slow painful slide to oblivion or a gentle slope of pink and green to heaven. However death, in the guise of 'living', presents itself, it is the memory of desires and not a place where life can reside.

Life can be seen whilst climbing the hills and surfing the valleys or sitting by the fire or ice, but life is always full and unhindered; and whereas my dreams are infinite they are frail and hounded.

I look more to the moon's reflection to see a more honest picture of myself. I do not imagine I am the brother of the sun.

The only thing I want to share is life; yet I am so devoid of the ability to do so, that I can't even relate with any true love even to a slug. For when a slug challenges me for food, being the greater power, I pick it up and throw it into another field so I can kill the carrot rather than leave the slug to the killing. I'm immersed in fighting with slugs over who can eat a radish. Hardly a quality of life for as life is eternal there's no need to compete for life. My existence is just a competition with other creatures to get the best pickings from our incessant killing, so there is no time or space to share life with others. Live is not a shared experience, and whilst I hold on to the comforts, security and material pleasures my conciousness demands there will be no end to my killing, so am in no position to criticise another for their killing more than me. However I do resent being press-ganged into agreeing to support others demands, just as those poorer than me resent my exploitation of their frailty